There were ostensibly three factors behind the recent stock market correction: (1) fear of a slow down in China, which can’t be stopped regardless of measures out of Beijing; (2) a sell off in commodities, which is pressuring emerging markets; and (3) continued concern about when the Federal Reserve will increase interest rates and how the lift off will impact asset prices. After two weeks of volatility, I am more convinced that the Fed may have had a larger role in the correction than the other two factors. Many look back to last Monday (aka “Black Monday” in China, where the main stock market index plunged 8.5 percent) as the beginning of the brutal downside action. Despite reports that Chinese government intervention was coming; there was none that day. All of the sudden, there was talk about the spread of contagion from a collapse in the Chinese stock market, to the Chinese economy, to emerging market economies and then to developed economies.
Let’s peel back the onion on this theory. According to Capital Economics, “The debacle in China’s equity market tells us little directly about what is going on in China’s economy.” The reason is that the massive bull market bubble, which began in 2014 and peaked on June 12th, “was speculative, rather than driven by any improvement in fundamentals…we are witnessing the inevitable implosion of an equity market bubble.” Since the top, the bears have wiped out $4.5 trillion of Chinese stock market value. Despite the massacre, the Shanghai Index is up 1.4 percent this year and a staggering 48 percent from a year ago.
Fear of a hard economic landing in China has been floating around for some time. In the big picture, the days of China’s double-digit growth rates are behind it. But because the total Chinese economy has increased in size, it continues to contribute more than a third of global growth. That’s why a slow down in growth from the government’s 7 percent target, to something closer to 5 percent this year, will reduce Chinese demand for a host of commodities, hence the rout in oil, industrial metals and emerging market trading partners who export those items to China.
And for those who were banking on the Chinese government to shield them from the effects of a slowdown, one hedge fund manager told me, “Too many investors believe that officials in Beijing know what they are doing. In fact, China is really in the minor league when it comes to economic management. Think of the U.S. as any big major league franchise, like the Yankees, the Giants or the Cardinals…China is like the Toledo Mud Hens-lots of great potential, but not in the show just yet.”
Of course all policy makers make mistakes (see: ECB), so maybe the take away is that when central bankers get nervous, we should all get nervous. And that leads us to what could have been the most important factor in the recent sell-off: the U.S. Federal Reserve. Yes, the impact of China and falling commodities is important, but some believe that that the selling pressure began on the Wednesday before Black Monday. That’s when minutes from the last Federal Reserve meeting were released. The officials’ views on current conditions painted a picture not of an economy rebounding strongly after a tough, weather-related first quarter, but of one that still faces downside risk, including “persistent weakness in the housing sector”. That comment prompted a lot of chatter because the data seem to indicate that housing is gaining a lot of momentum.
All of the sudden, it appeared that the Fed was not entirely sure what was going on and how it would respond to global events – that uncertainty sent shivers across trading floors. The stock drop only ceased after New York Federal Reserve President Bill Dudley, said that turbulence in the financial markets made a September rate hike “less compelling” than it was a few weeks ago.
With an economy growing at a better than three percent annualized pace, a labor market creating more than 200,000 positions per month, consumers and businesses spending more freely and a housing market finally making inroads, the best justification the central bank has for keeping rates at emergency levels is that there is little evidence of inflation. Still, it is hard to justify treating the U.S. economy like it is still in the intensive care unit. At some point, the central bank is going to have to normalize policy and when it does, nobody really knows how financial markets will react.
MARKETS: With one trading day left in August, stocks are on track for their worst monthly performance in three years.
- DJIA: 16,643 up 1.1% on week, down 6.6% YTD
- S&P 500: 1,988 up 0.9% on week, down 3.4% YTD
- NASDAQ: 4,828 up 2.6% on week, up 1.9 YTD
- Russell 2000: 1163, up 0.5% on week, down 3.5% YTD
- 10-Year Treasury yield: 2.19% (from 2.05% a week ago)
- October Crude: $45.22, up 11.8% on week
- December Gold: $1,134, down 2.2% on week
- AAA Nat'l avg. for gallon of reg. gas: $2.49 (from $2.61 wk ago, $3.44 a year ago)
THE WEEK AHEAD: It will be a busy, pre-holiday week on the economic calendar, highlighted by the August employment report. It is expected that the economy created 225,000 jobs and the unemployment rate should edge down to 5.2 percent.
9:45 Chicago PMI
10:30 Dallas Fed Mfg Survey
Motor Vehicle Sales
9:45 PMI Manufacturing Index
10:00 ISM Mfg Index
10:00 Construction Spending
8:15 ADP Employment Report
8:30 Productivity and Costs
10:00 Factory Orders
2:00 Fed Beige Book
Thurs 9/3: 9:45 PMI Services Index
10:00 ISM Non-Mfg Index
8:30 August Jobs Report